您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 95 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.95 
Date 1962/2/28
Issue Does the restriction stipulated in Article 17, Paragraph 2, of the Public Functionaries Appointment Act apply to a public servant who is guilty of derelict behavior after appointment?
Holding
1
    The restriction stipulated in Article 17, Paragraph 2, of the Public Functionaries Appointment Act applies to a public servant who is guilty of derelict behavior after appointment .


Reasoning
1
    Article 17, Subparagraph 2, of the Public Functionaries Appointment Act stipulates the negative qualifications of a public servant. Article 2 of the Public Functionaries Disciplinary Act stipulates reasons that are limited to illegal use of position and other derelict behavior. The main purposes of the Functionaries Appointment Act and the Public Functionaries Disciplinary Act are different. A person who is guilty of the abovementioned acts cannot be a public servant. However, if such acts are committed by an appointed public servant, he can be removed from office based on the legislative purpose. Pursuant to J.Y. Interpretation No.66, if a public servant has been granted probation after being found guilty of corruption, he is still considered a public servant after the expiration of the probation. However, he will be demoted and his salary will be reduced (See Yuan Tzu Interpretation No. 2451).

'Translated by Lawrence L. C. Lee.

Opinion Chinese only
 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點