您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 61 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.61 
Date 1956/8/13
Issue According to Article 95 of the Criminal Law for the Armed Forces, are a soldier’s military stripes an essential military item?
Holding   Even if a soldier in uniform with his/her military stripes intact is suspected of being AWOL [absent without leave], this is not sufficient evidence to establish the crime of being AWOL because the essential military items, as designated in Article 95 of the Criminal Law for the Armed Forces, do not include such military stripes. Therefore, the Judicial Yuan Explanation No. 2044 issued on August 3, 1940, concerning essential military items should no longer apply.

'Translated by Lawrence L. C. Lee.

 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點