您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 385 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.385 
Date 1995/9/8
Issue 1) Shall the application of a tax law be partial and selective when it imposes co-related rights and duties?
2) Is the Ministry of Finance Directive Tai-Tsai-Shui-Tze No. 800356032, September 24, 1992, requiring those foreign companies that have enjoyed and been enjoying tax preferential treatments given by the Statute for the Encouragement of Investment to pay twenty percent income taxes under Article 16, Paragraph 3, of the same statute while paying after-tax earnings to their head offices, in contravention to the Constitution?
Holding
1
    Article 19 of the Constitution mandates that people have duties to pay taxes prescribed by law. In addition, Article 19 stipulates that people have duties to pay taxes according to the taxpaying entities, items, rates, payment methods and payment periods so prescribed by tax laws. However, when such a tax law imposes co-related rights and duties on people, in order to preserve the integrity of the application of law and to balance the imposed rights and duties, it shall not be applied partially and selectively. Those qualified foreign companies that were approved under the then-in-effect Article 3 of the Statute for the Encouragement of Investment may still enjoy the preferential tax treatments after its expiration. Therefore, in order to be consistent with the legislative intent, those qualified foreign companies shall pay twenty percent income taxes under Article 16, Paragraph 3, of the same statute while paying after-tax earnings to their head offices. The Ministry of Finance Directive Tai-Tsai-Shui-Tze No. 800356032, September 24, 1992, is consistent with the foregoing, and is therefore not in contravention to the Constitution.



Reasoning
1
    Article 19 of the Constitution mandates that people have duties to pay taxes prescribed by law. In addition, Article 19 stipulates that people have duties to pay taxes according to the taxpaying entities, items, rates, payment methods and payment periods so prescribed by tax laws. However, when such a tax law imposes co-related rights and duties on people, in order to preserve the integrity of the application of law and to balance the imposed rights and duties, it shall not be applied partially and selectively. Those foreign companies that were approved for preferential tax treatments under Article 3 of the Statute for the Encouragement of Investment, as amended on January 26, 1987, shall pay twenty percent income taxes under Article 16, Paragraph 3, of the same statute while paying after-tax earnings to their head offices. The legislative intent is that since those qualified foreign companies’ Taiwan branch offices enjoy preferential tax treatments, they shall pay the income taxes mentioned above while paying after-tax earnings to their head offices; otherwise, foreign companies may simply set up Taiwan branches to avoid paying taxes in Taiwan. Therefore, the two Articles of the same statute are co-related and shall not be applied partially and selectively. Though the above mentioned statute had expired and was no longer in effect on December 31, 1990, those qualified foreign companies that were approved (for four-or five-year exemptions) under Article 3 of the same statute while it was still in effect may still enjoy preferential tax treatments to protect investors’ rights. Since those qualified foreign companies may still enjoy preferential tax treatments after the expiration of the same statute, to be consistent with the legislative intent, Article 16, Paragraph 3, shall also be applicable to impose co-related income taxes on their head offices. The Ministry of Finance Directive Tai-Tsai-Shui-Tze No. 800356032, September 24, 1992, states that: “To ensure a fair tax policy, those foreign companies that have enjoyed and been enjoying tax preferential treatments given by the Statute for the Encouragement of Investment shall pay twenty percent income taxes under Article 16, Paragraph 3, of the same statute while paying after-tax earnings to their head offices.” This Directive is consistent with the foregoing in prohibiting partial and selective applications and preserving the integrity of the application of law, and is therefore not in contravention to the Constitution.

'Translated by Professor Spenser Y. Hor.
Opinion Chinese only
 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點