您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 285 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.285 
Date 1991/9/27
Issue Are the relevant administrative order and guidelines, which stipulate that retired government and public school employees are not entitled to the family funeral allowance unconstitutional?
Holding
1
    The “monthly pension payment”, stipulated in the Act Governing the Retirement of School Teachers and Staff (hereinafter, “the Act”), does not include the “family funeral allowance” by its nature. The wording “family funeral allowance not included in the pension payment” was interpreted in the Tai (69) Ren Cheng Si Tze No. 7498 Letter, issued by the Executive Yuan on April 16, 1980. This interpretation does not violate the legislative purpose of the Act. Moreover, the “Central Government and Public School Employee Welfare Subsidies Payments Guidelines” (hereinafter, “the Guidelines”), issued by the Executive Yuan, are mandated to ensure the livelihood of the current government and public school employees. The Guidelines are discretionary measures made by the authorized administrative agency, and do not apply to non-government employees. Retired government employees, of course, are not entitled to the “family funeral allowance” payment. Therefore, the relevant administrative order and guidelines issued by the Executive Yuan do not violate the Constitution.
Reasoning
1
    The “monthly pension payment”, regulated in Article 8 of the Act Governing the Retirement of School Teachers and Staff (hereinafter, “the Act”), includes basic remuneration and other cash allowances. By its nature, it does not include the “family funeral allowance”, which is not paid monthly and is not available until certain events occur. The wording “family funeral allowance not included in the pension payment” was interpreted in the Tai (69) Ren Cheng Si Tze No. 7498 Letter, issued by the Executive Yuan on April 16, 1980. This interpretation does not violate the legislative purpose of the Act. Moreover, the “Central Government and Public School Employee Welfare Subsidies Payments Guidelines”(hereinafter, “the Guidelines”), issued by the Executive Yuan in the Tai (77) Ren Cheng Si Tze No. 23391 Letter on June 30, 1988, are mandated to ensure the livelihood of the current government and public school employees. The Guidelines are discretionary measures made by the authorized administrative agency. Article 4 of the Guidelines provides that the Guidelines are only applicable to current government employees under the limited budgets of government agencies and public schools. Retired government employees are not entitled to apply for the “family funeral allowance”. Therefore, the relevant administrative order and guidelines issued by the Executive Yuan do not violate the Constitution. The extra benefits, besides the pension payment, paid by the government to provide for the livelihood of retired employees are remunerated under administrative discretion after calculating the nation’s capital and the nature of all kinds of benefits. However, retired government employees are not entitled to all of the benefits available to current government employees.

'Translated by Professor Chin-Chin Cheng.
 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點