您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 283 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.283 
Date 1991/8/6
Issue Does a pardon granted by the President have retroactive effect?
Holding
1
    The President’s pardon, which declares the nullity of a pronounced offense and punishment, granted in accordance with Article 40 of the Constitution and the latter part of Article 3 of the Amnesty Act does not have retroactive effect on executed punishment. The civil rights of a person that have been pronounced to be deprived shall be restored from the effective date of the pardon order. With respect to public office lost due to a final conviction, the convicted person may apply to the competent authority requesting the disposition of this matter according to relevant laws, provided that the lost public office can be prospectively reinstated.
Reasoning
1
    The Constitution of the Republic of China provides in Article 40 that: “The President shall, in accordance with law, exercise the power of granting general pardons, pardons, commutation of sentences and restoration of civil rights.” Article 3 of the Amnesty Act states that: “After a pardon is granted to a person subject to a pronouncement of offense and punishment, the execution of the punishment is waived; under special circumstances the pronouncement of offense and punishment may be deemed a nullity.” In order to maintain the stability of legal order and the existing result of the execution [of a sentence] according to the law, the pardon granted by the President in accordance with the aforesaid Article 40 of the Constitution and the latter part of Article 3 of the Amnesty Act declaring the nullity of the pronounced offense and punishment shall not have retroactive effect. However, since the pronounced offense and punishment become invalid from the effective date of the pardon order, the person pronounced to be deprived of civil rights shall recover his civil rights from that effective date. With respect to public office lost due to a final conviction, the convicted person may apply to the competent authority requesting the disposition of this matter according to this Interpretative ruling and relevant laws, provided that the lost public office can be prospectively reinstated.

'Translated by Jennifer Lin of Tsar & Tsai Law Firm.
 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點