您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 26 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.26 
Date 1953/10/9
Issue Does Article 17 of the Rules Governing the Supervision of the Pawnshops contradict Articles 949 and 950 of the Civil Code?
Holding
1
    Since the pawnshop business is publicly operated and under the supervision of an authorized government agency, it shall be protected under the law unless its operator has knowledge that the object to be pawned has been stolen or looted. Article 17 of the Rules Governing the Supervision of the Pawnshops is for the purpose of harmonizing and reconciling the interests between the claimant of recovery rights and bona fide possessor, which does not contradict the legislative spirit of Article 950 of the Civil Code. Hence, there is no issue of contradiction with Article 949 of the same Code.

'Translated by Professor Andy Y. Sun.
 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點