您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 249 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.249 
Date 1989/11/24
Issue Is it constitutional to order an informer in a criminal case to appear before the court and, if he fails to do so without good cause, arrest and force him to appear to give testimony, like a witness?
Holding
1
    An informer is a third person other than a "party" in a case as defined by the Code of Criminal Procedure. If the court deems it necessary to call an informer to testify, he may of course be summoned in pursuance of Article 178 of the Code of Criminal Procedure concerning a witness. He may also be arrested and forced to appear before the court for the purpose of discovering the truth if he fails to appear without good cause. Accordingly, our Interpretation Yuan-tze No. 47 holding that Article 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure then prevailing, i.e., Article 178 of the present Act as amended, may be made applicable to informers is not in conflict with the Constitution.
Reasoning
1
    A witness is a third party who is ordered by the court to state what he has seen or heard in relation to an action, and whatever he has seen or heard may serve as an important basis for discovery of the truth and is non-substitutable. Unless otherwise prescribed by law, every person has the duty to testify before a court. Thus, the Code of Criminal Procedure provides in Article 178, Paragraph 1, that "a lawfully summoned witness who fails to appear without proper reason may be fined a sum of not more than fifty yuan, and in addition thereto may be arrested with a warrant. If he fails to appear when summoned again, the same punishment may be imposed." Discovery of the truth of a case may be achieved through examination of the witness, and is essential to maintaining the social order and increasing the public interest. Like a witness, an informer is a third party other than a "party" in a criminal case. If the court deems it necessary to call an informer to state during the proceeding what he has seen or heard, he may of course be taken as a witness and treated in pursuance of the provision quoted above. Accordingly, our Interpretation No. Yuan-tze 47 holding that Article 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure then prevailing, i.e., Article 178 of the present Act as amended, may be made applicable to informers is not in conflict with the Constitution. 

'Translated by Raymond T. Chu.
 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點