您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 191 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.191 
Date 1984/11/30
Issue Does the directive issued by the Department of Health requiring a pharmacist who opens a pharmacy to engage in the preparation of prescription drugs and sales of over-the-counter medicine to apply for a druggist registration and a business license violate the right to work as guaranteed by Article 15 of the Constitution?
Holding
1
    Directive No 286403 issued by the Department of Health in the Executive Yuan on July 18, 1980, requires a pharmacist who opens a pharmacy to engage in the preparation of prescription drugs and sales of over-the-counter medicine, to submit a druggist registration application and to apply for a business license. The purpose of this Directive is to regulate the services of the druggist and to improve the pharmaceutics. This requirement has no adverse effect on the right of work of a pharmacist and is consistent with Article 15 of the Constitution.
Reasoning
1
    To regulate the services of the druggist and to improve the pharmaceutics, Article 23, Paragraph 1, of the Drugs and Pharmacists Management Act provides that an applicant for the position of druggist should submit an application of approval to the competent authority and register his/her name and pay for the license fee after obtaining approval from the competent authority. The applicant should not open a pharmacy to engage in the preparation of prescription drugs and sales of over-the-counter medicine without obtaining the druggist license. In addition, Article 7 of the Business Tax Act provides that no one should operate a business without obtaining a business license from the competent authority. Therefore, anyone who opens a pharmacy to engage in the preparation of prescription drugs and sales of over-the-counter medicine must submit a druggist registration application and apply for a business license in compliance with the legislative intent of the law.

2
    Furthermore, Article 15 of the Pharmacist Act states: "Services provided by pharmacists are: (1) sales or administration of pharmaceutical products, (2) prescription and preparation of pharmaceutical products, (3) appraisal of pharmaceutical products, (4) supervision of the manufacturing of pharmaceutical products, (5) supervision of the storage, supply, and packaging of pharmaceutical products, (6) supervision of the manufacturing of cosmetics containing medicine, and (7) to be performed by pharmacists under the law." If the pharmacist is only engaged in the preparation of prescription drugs within the scope of his specialty, the pharmacist is required by the Pharmacist Act to submit a pharmacist registration application. However, if the pharmacist is also engaged in the sales of over-the-counter medicine, the pharmacist is considered to be operating a pharmaceutical business under the law. While engaging in the sales of over-the-counter medicine is also within the scope of his specialty, the pharmacist is nevertheless required by the applicable provisions of the Drugs and Pharmacists Management Act and the Business Tax Act to submit a druggist registration application and to apply for a business license in compliance with the purpose of regulating the services of the druggist.

3
    In sum, it is evident that Directive No 286403 issued by the Department of Health in the Executive Yuan on July 18, 1980, requiring a pharmacist who opens a pharmacy to engage in the preparation of prescription drugs and sales of over-the-counter medicine to submit a druggist registration application and to apply for a business license, is to regulate the services of the druggist and to improve the pharmaceutics. The requirement that the pharmacist who is engaged in the sales of over-the-counter medicine must submit an application of approval to the competent authority and register his/her name and pay for the license fee after obtaining the approval from the competent authority, has no adverse effect on the right of work of a pharmacist and is consistent with Article 15 of the Constitution.

'Translated by Li-Chih Lin, Esq., J.D.
 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點