您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 149 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.149 
Date 1977/6/17
Issue Who shall be ordered to make good the payment of the court costs derived from the decision made before the remanded trial?
Holding
1
    When there is a party appealing against the judgment of a remanded trial, and if there is any omission or unpaid portion of the court costs which shall be paid for the first appeal, the court shall precisely levy it on the first appellant. And if there is still an omission or unpaid portion of such payment even though the decision of the tried case has already been rendered, the court shall fix ex officio the amount of the court costs by a ruling and order the party who shall bear the costs of an action to make good the payment. Interpretation Yuan-je Tze No. 2936 (2) about the court costs shall thus be supplemented.
Reasoning
1
    Court costs are among the fees which the country shall levy. The court shall count and levy the court costs after assessing the value and amount of the subject matter of an action; the court shall not causally allow the parties to omit or leave partially unpaid the payment of the court costs, then could be in conformance with the non-gratuitous principle embraced by the Code of Civil Procedure. Interpretation Yuan-je Tze No. 2936 (2) partially reveals that in regard to the appeal against the judgment of a remanded trial, even though the court has discovered that there is actually an unpaid portion of payment of the court costs which shall be paid for the first appeal, the court may not order the first appellant to make good the payment. What this Interpretation does mean is that the court shall not, again, investigate whether there is any defect in the prerequisites of the first appeal; it does not mean that the court does not need to levy the court costs precisely. Therefore, when there is a party appealing against the judgment of a remanded trial, and if there is any omission or unpaid portion of payment of the court costs which shall be paid for the first appeal, the court shall precisely levy it on the first appellant. And if there is still an omission or unpaid portion of such payment even though the decision of the tried case has already been rendered, the court shall fix ex officio the amount of the court costs by a ruling and order the party who shall bear the costs of an action to make good the payment. The Interpretation Yuan-je Tze No. 2936 (2) about the court costs shall thus be supplemented.

'Translated by Jer -Shenq Shieh.
Opinion Chinese only
 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點