您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容
司法院內部與外部景觀圖片動畫
::: | | 大法官 | 案件審理 | 大法官解釋 | 相關法規 | |
 
多條件查詢頁面按鈕

 

:::
 

大法官解釋表頭

(釋字第 117 號 )      友善列印PRINT  
Interpretation
J.Y.
Interpretation
NO.117 
Date 1966/11/9
Issue During national turmoil, is it contradictory to the Constitution to declare and replace vacant seats in the National Assembly without going through the election and recall process?
Holding
1
    The provisions of Article 3, Subparagraph 1, and Article 4 of the Act Governing Replacement of Any Vacant Seat of the First Term National Assembly are not inconsistent with the Constitution.
Reasoning
1
    Article 34 of the Constitution stated that the election and recall of the National Assembly delegates should be provided by law. The Act Governing Replacement of Any Vacant Seat of the First Term National Assembly (hereinafter the ”Act”) is a supplementary provision to the Act Governing the Election and Recall of the National Assembly Delegates and its Enforcement Act. Article 3, Subparagraph 1, of the Act provided that if a delegate has not reported to office for three years, and has not made timely appearance after a notice of appearance was published, his or her seat shall be deemed vacant for cause. Article 4 of the Act provided that if this happened with a replacement delegate, he or she should also be disqualified. These provisions were adopted to meet the needs of the nation after the central government moved to Taiwan. They are not inconsistent with pertinent provisions of the Constitution.

'Translated by Robert Huai-Ching Tsai.
 

BACK

 
 
::: Home 中文(Chinese) Site Map
 
使用聲明 Copyright©2004 JUSTICES OF THE CONSTITUTIONSL COURT. JUDICIAL YUAN 本網站建議使用解析度為1024*768全彩及Explorer5.5以上瀏覽器     通過A+等級無障礙網頁檢測
多條件查詢頁面連結點 解釋爭點總覽頁面連結點